Posted by: grc () on Wed May 5 17:32:49 2004

i think you may have misunderstood a recent post of mine...i'm posting a clarification here rather than in the same thread, because that thread was once again starting to degenerate into the same old silliness that seems to happen so often....

when i was referring to the linear hitter having about .0167 more time to react than a rotational hitter, i was referring to the hitter having .0167 seconds more of reaction time than the rotational hitter...of course this fact is well documented so i won't rehash the basis for this fact...