Posted by: grc () on Thu May 6 06:50:29 2004

i think you may have misunderstood a recent post of mine...i'm posting a clarification here rather than in the same thread, because that thread was once again starting to degenerate into the same old silliness that seems to happen so often....
> >
> > when i was referring to the linear hitter having about .0167 more time to react than a rotational hitter, i was referring to the hitter having .0167 seconds more of reaction time than the rotational hitter...of course this fact is well documented so i won't rehash the basis for this fact...
>
> "Well documented". As if all hitters are equal and regardless of their technique thy all have .0167 more seconds.
>
> Do you posters really believe this poppeycock?

teacherman the documentation is all out there for those who care...just because it is over your does not make it "poppE?ycock"....however i do respect your right to a rigorous rebuttal...and you did indeed make the most rigorous rebuttal that you are capable of, and for that you should be commended...