Bat Speed -- Baseball Hitting Forum

Posted by: Teacherman () on Thu May 6 09:57:34 2004

i think you may have misunderstood a recent post of mine...i'm posting a clarification here rather than in the same thread, because that thread was once again starting to degenerate into the same old silliness that seems to happen so often....
> > >
> > > when i was referring to the linear hitter having about .0167 more time to react than a rotational hitter, i was referring to the hitter having .0167 seconds more of reaction time than the rotational hitter...of course this fact is well documented so i won't rehash the basis for this fact...
> >
> > "Well documented". As if all hitters are equal and regardless of their technique thy all have .0167 more seconds.
> >
> > Do you posters really believe this poppeycock?
>
> teacherman the documentation is all out there for those who care...just because it is over your does not make it "poppE?ycock"....however i do respect your right to a rigorous rebuttal...and you did indeed make the most rigorous rebuttal that you are capable of, and for that you should be commended...

It's impossible to point to documentation that doesn't exist isn't it grc?

Followups:

Post a followup:

Name:

E-mail:

Subject:

Text:

> i think you may have misunderstood a recent post of mine...i'm posting a clarification here rather than in the same thread, because that thread was once again starting to degenerate into the same old silliness that seems to happen so often....
> > > > 
> > > > when i was referring to the linear hitter having about .0167 more time to react than a rotational hitter, i was referring  to the hitter having .0167 seconds more of reaction time than the rotational hitter...of course this fact is well documented so i won't rehash the basis for this fact...
> > > 
> > > "Well documented".  As if all hitters are equal and regardless of their technique thy all have .0167 more seconds.  
> > > 
> > > Do you posters really believe this poppeycock?
> > 
> > teacherman the documentation is all out there for those who care...just because it is over your does not make it               "poppE?ycock"....however i do respect your right to a rigorous rebuttal...and you did indeed make the most rigorous rebuttal that you are capable of, and for that you should be commended...
> 
> It's impossible to point to documentation that doesn't exist isn't it grc?

Anti-Spambot Question:

This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts