[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Defending the Strike Zone vs Zone hitting


Posted by: Scott B (baseball@integritycorp.com) on Tue Jun 25 23:17:35 2002


> Epstein believes that the challenge of getting the timing right is severe enough that you should anticipate(be selective/zone hit) inside or out on a full swing with less than 2 strikes.It is also useful to think of each swing as a go until aborting if it then doesn't fit your plan.Have an appropriately aggressive plan for each pitch.
===================================================================
Agreed. I still teach the "zone hitting" concept, which basically states shrink the zone on a hitters count, and open it a bit on a pitchers count. Since reading Epstein and others, I've gotten a bit more sophisticated, though. Epstein says that you can't defend both sides of the plate, i.e. guess your pitch and inside or outside.

Obviously, the "zone" will change will the situation, including type of pitcher, how much success he's having, how you're hitting, how many outs, stike/ball count, score of the game, etc.. But I think it's vital for hitters to set their own zone, anticipated pitch, and strategy for each pitch in the AB. Lots of guys have fundamentals that looks like Bonds or Gwynn, but only a few seem to be able to focus their attention for the quarter second they have to make their hitting decisions. The "plan" and "zone hitting" makes the difference, in my opinion.

But then, I haven't gotten a single hit or HR in MLB this year, so I defer to all those who have.

Regards.. Scott B


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
How many innings in an MLB game?
   4
   3
   9
   2

   
[   SiteMap   ]