Posted by: () on Fri Nov 30 13:23:46 2001

Here is the address for a hitting thread over on eteamz. One fellow likes Epstein OK, but then proceeds to preach the opposite of everything Mike teaches. He doesn't like Jack at all so I have asked him for specific things that he disagrees with Jack on. Should be amusing as he tries to scramble for nonrefutable facts. I would be interested to see if you guys thought I was presenting the rotational argument correctly.
> >
> > http://www.eteamz.com/baseball/boards/baseball/message.cfm?id=363722
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark H.
>
> Mark-
>
> Good luck! I hope you've got the flak jacket on and are up for incoming.
> Remember,this is mostly a religious argument and facts may only confuse the issue.Careful when people start talking about perverting the meaning of Ted which they somehow are the authority on.
>
> One random association I remember is a quote of Ted's in the Louisville Slugger book,related to the axe swing.He talked about matching the plane being analagous to both swinging up and down as you would to cut a V shaped area on the tree,in other words this is an analogy for adjusting the plane,not just swinging up or just swinging down.This would be related to Epstein's weathervaning cues.

Thanks. I'll quote that with credit in that thread.

Mark H.