Posted by: Mark H. (mark_h45@hotmail.com) on Fri Nov 30 13:27:00 2001

Here is the address for a hitting thread over on eteamz. One fellow likes Epstein OK, but then proceeds to preach the opposite of everything Mike teaches. He doesn't like Jack at all so I have asked him for specific things that he disagrees with Jack on. Should be amusing as he tries to scramble for nonrefutable facts. I would be interested to see if you guys thought I was presenting the rotational argument correctly.
> > >
> > > http://www.eteamz.com/baseball/boards/baseball/message.cfm?id=363722
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark H.
> >
> > Mark-
> >
> > Good luck! I hope you've got the flak jacket on and are up for incoming.
> > Remember,this is mostly a religious argument and facts may only confuse the issue.Careful when people start talking about perverting the meaning of Ted which they somehow are the authority on.
> >
> > One random association I remember is a quote of Ted's in the Louisville Slugger book,related to the axe swing.He talked about matching the plane being analagous to both swinging up and down as you would to cut a V shaped area on the tree,in other words this is an analogy for adjusting the plane,not just swinging up or just swinging down.This would be related to Epstein's weathervaning cues.
>
> Thanks. I'll quote that with credit in that thread.
>
> Mark H.

By the way, you're right about the religious conviction part. The key is just stay calm and keep asking questions you know they can't answer. ;)

Mark H.