Posted by: Teacherman () on Fri May 21 19:34:55 2004

>>> in your diagram you define torque ok but you misinterpret what the hitter id doing.....you are showing the top hand heading toward the catcher and the bottom hand heading toward the pitcher....since these are two "opposing" directions you therefore call it torque...maybe it would be torque if in fact these were two forces (the top and bottom hands) acting in opposition to each other....however, even though the top hand may be headed toward the catcher, i don't see how that the top hand is acting in opposition to the bottom hand....<<<
>
> Hi grc
>
> When the top-hand is pulling back on the handle, the bottom is exerting a force on the handle in the opposite direction, even when the bottom-hand is stationary. --- If you push your hand against a wall, the wall must push back with the same force or be accelerated away. --- However, during initiation of the swing, shoulder rotation is accelerating the bottom-hand in an arc around toward the pitcher.
>
> Therefore, at initiation, the top-hand is being pulled back toward the catcher while at the same time shoulder rotation is driving the bottom-hand around toward the pitcher. The hands are therefore applying force to the handle from opposing directions – just as the drawing shows. And just as I have described it countless times.
>
> Jack Mankin
>

The force may be going through the hands to the bat but it is not being generated by the hands. The hands are not generating forces in opposite directions. Therefore it is very poorly named and it has become a very debatable issue which is confusing many people. And, why confuse people simply because of the language you choose?

If a boxer lands a right hand was hand torque used?................Makes as much sense as your wall analogy.