Re: Re: Re: A-Rod & The Swing Plane ‘cont”
Posted by: rql ( ) on Fri Aug 24 15:42:29 2007
> > Hi All
> >
> > This is a continuation of the “A-Rod & The Swing Plane” thread below. We were running off the page, so I am starting it as a new thread.
> >
> > (Shawn)
> > >>> Jack,
> >
> > Stop dodging the issues!!
> >
> > Your making no sense and pulling things out of thin air.
> >
> > Torque is not the cause of batspeed. I bet I could go out and swing the bat with just my lead arm and generate a good deal batspeed (close to as using two hands).
> >
> > Batspeed is generated through "momentum" transfer. It the whip affect, I know you don't understand the whip.
> >
> > What the heck do you mean the bat travels through 200 degrees, look at the clip the bat travels the "same" distance the shoulders rotate.
> >
> > Stop denying video just to support your theory, you sound as bad as the second engine guys. Just making stuff up. <<<
>
>
> Shawn,
>
> Jack is absolutely correct about the distance the bat travels versus the distance the shoulders travel.
>
> YOU and the PCR/PCRW guys are the ones denying video.
>
> IMO, Jack has not defined what is causing the barrel's movement properly. But he sees it. So do I.
>
> YOU and the boys are simply denying the video evidence.
I wish someone could tell me what PCR is so I would know if I am one of the boys or not.
Followups:
Post a followup:
|