Posted by: josh (jsorge5126@aol.com) on Sun Apr 9 22:45:27 2000

>>>Why do you have to get it around earlier? Why not just take it opposite field. I know this is an old saying, but "hit where it's pitched. <<<
> >
> > Hi David
> >
> > David, the point I was trying to make is that linear (weight-shift & extension) mechanics cannot develop good bat speed on outside pitches. So they recommend an inside-out swing which basically means the bat-head is dragging through the zone. That type of swing is a relatively weak swing.
> >
> > I have no problem hitting the ball where it is pitched as long as the ball is hit hard. Initiating the swing with the two forces that generates bat speed, torque and a circular hand-path, develops bat energy early in the swing. The batter can still hit the ball where it is pitched, but with real "pop."
> >
> > Note: With rotational mechanics the bat-head gets to the zone much earlier, therefor the back arm is much less extended (by 4 to 6 in.) than with extension mechanics. Yet, many coaches refer to extension mechanics as “short, quick and compact” and rotational as “longer and slower.” It makes you wonder.
> >
> > Jack Mankin
> >

Jack,

Who is the "they" you say recommends an inside-out swing on outside pitches. I'm also a little confused on what you are trying to explain should happen on an outside pitch. Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the swing be the same on a pitch middle out as middle in? The only difference is letting the ball get deeper in the stance? Bat angle dictates where the ball is hit. That's the whole point of letting it get deep. Otherwise, hitters would (i know you hate this term but i'm going to use it anyway) roll-over or go around the pitch away from them. please clarify (and yes, i have read your posts in previous threads,truisms and fallacies, etc)

thank you,

josh