Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack, you now agree?
Posted by: Mark H. ( ) on Wed Dec 5 14:18:10 2001
>>>My post of 11-29-2001 responded to your questions(regarding my posts on arm/hand strength).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did I answer your questions to your satisfaction and are we now in full agreement? <<<
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi HitMan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you meant that the hands should stay back and allow shoulder rotation and the bat’s reaction to torque to accelerate the hand-path -- instead of extending the arms. Then we are in full agreement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jack Mankin
> > > > >
> > > > > Jack,
> > > > >
> > > > > You have know idea what you are talking about.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe A.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Who is the "you" to which you, Joe A., are referring, Jack or Hitman?
> > > >
> > > > By the way, I'm still waiting for that link to your website.
> > > >
> > > > Also, when you say "know idea", is that a mispelling or something clever I'm not getting? Either way, you are great entertainment. Keep it up.
> > > >
> > > > Mark H.
> > >
> > > Hey Joe (A) -
> > > what happened to ThePitchingMound.com? It's been down for days. Why don't you get it up and running again? And why do the people there deny ever hearing of you?
> >
> > Hey, what does it take for you to understand, someone was imposturing me. That sight is even more litewait than this sight.
>
> Thanks for the clarification. After consulting my dictionary and exploring creative spelling variations, I do understand what you are trying to say. Unfortunately I thought I was talking to the imposture!
Major Dan,
Probably some sort of code. Perhaps if we weren't so "litewait" we could understand it.
Mark H.
Followups:
Post a followup:
|