Re: RQL attempts the impossible
Posted by: Jack Mankin (
MrBatspeed@aol.com
) on Sat Oct 20 17:43:25 2001
Hi Tom
Would you mind expanding further on your above post. – Seriously Tom, I not only enjoy reading your material, I also never fail to gain from your insight and thoroughness.
Jack
Followups:
Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
RQL
[ Sun Oct 21 07:47:43 2001 ]
Re: Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
tom.guerry
[ Sun Oct 21 09:06:36 2001 ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
rql
[ Wed Oct 24 19:09:52 2001 ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
tom.guerry
[ Thu Oct 25 11:52:13 2001 ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
rql
[ Thu Oct 25 17:59:36 2001 ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RQL attempts the impossible
tom.guerry
[ Fri Oct 26 08:17:43 2001 ]
Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:
> Hi Tom > > Would you mind expanding further on your above post. – Seriously Tom, I not only enjoy reading your material, I also never fail to gain from your insight and thoroughness. > > Jack
Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
Single, double, triple, homerun
Four singles
Three homeruns
Three stikeouts
[
SiteMap
]