Bat Speed -- Baseball Hitting Forum

Posted by: Mark H. () on Sun Aug 5 12:55:21 2001

Jack,
> >
> > I think that you have done a great job describing the swing mechanics and answering all tough questions on the board. Generally, Epstein diverts most questions that directly asks him to describe the mechanics of the swing, arguing that simplicity is fastest way to success, which I believe is a cheap way of saying "I don't know;" however, recently, I think that Epstein has provided more insight into his philosophy.
> >
> > *****
> > Could you please describe the main difference between your approach and his OR do you disfavor any technique that Epstein advocates and why?
> > *****
> >
> > I think many of us are interested in your answer and then maybe Epstein will go out on a limb and defend his techniques after learning of your response.
> >
> > Jack (and Mike), I hope that my request is appropriate, but I think this is what the readers want and would assist them in making their decision.
> >
> > Coach Tom
> >
> >The timing of your question is interesting to me since I watched both Mike and Jacks videos again just yesterday. It was a slow day at the facility so I hooked up the TV /VCR and sat back. I found Mikes videos to have much more tangible information in it as relates to how to teach the upper and lower half swing parts. Jacks video has good information on why a rotational swing is better than a linear swing but the nuts and bolts of teaching it are somewhat lacking. Mike also admits in his video that due to time constraints he did't cover hitting zone locations much but neither does Jack. I think we'd all like to see the next video from these guys.I don't think either of them need to defend their views.(especially against each other) Mike is basing his information on a lot more experience than any of us will ever have and Jack's studies and theories are far more extensive than most of us have the time or ability to perform.
> Stevo

I'm not saying I'm qualified to answer this question, but I will anyway and then sit back and find out if I was right or not.:-)

I would say the differences between them are more in terms of emphasis, teaching technique and terminology rather than differences in swing mechanics. Reading both has helped me understand the other one.

Mark H.

Followups:

Post a followup:

Name:

E-mail:

Subject:

Text:

> Jack,
> > > 
> > > I think that you have done a great job describing the swing mechanics and answering all tough questions on the board.  Generally, Epstein diverts most questions that directly asks him to describe the mechanics of the swing, arguing that simplicity is fastest way to success, which I believe is a cheap way of saying "I don't know;" however, recently, I think that Epstein has provided more insight into his philosophy.  
> > > 
> > > *****
> > > Could you please describe the main difference between your approach and his OR do you disfavor any technique that Epstein advocates and why?
> > > *****
> > > 
> > > I think many of us are interested in your answer and then maybe Epstein will go out on a limb and defend his techniques after learning of your response.
> > > 
> > > Jack (and Mike), I hope that my request is appropriate, but I think this is what the readers want and would assist them in making their decision.
> > > 
> > > Coach Tom
> > > 
> > >The timing of your question is interesting to me since I watched both Mike and Jacks videos again just yesterday. It was a slow day at the facility so I hooked up the TV /VCR and sat back. I found Mikes videos to have much more tangible information in it as relates to how to teach the upper and lower half swing parts. Jacks video has good information on why a rotational swing is better than a linear swing but the nuts and bolts of teaching it are somewhat lacking. Mike also admits in his video that due to time constraints he did't cover hitting zone locations much but neither does Jack. I think we'd all like to see the next video from these guys.I don't think either of them need to defend their views.(especially against each other) Mike is basing his information on a lot more experience than any of us will ever have and Jack's studies and theories are far more extensive than most of us have the time or ability to perform.
> > Stevo
> 
> I'm not saying I'm qualified to answer this question, but I will anyway and then sit back and find out if I was right or not.:-)
> 
> I would say the differences between them are more in terms of emphasis, teaching technique and terminology rather than differences in swing mechanics. Reading both has helped me understand the other one.
> 
> Mark H.

Anti-Spambot Question:

This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts