Posted by: Sam R. () on Mon Jun 12 12:57:51 2006

> > BHL,
> > For one who brags of of his intellect, you contradict yourself too easily.
> >
> > For example- you state "smaller hitters" should take advantage of your PFO theory then you use Ken Griffey Jr.,Ted Williams, and Mel Ott (power hitters) as your "proof" of your theory.
> >
> > Add to same- your quote that YOU ..."unearthed an integral concept"
> > Uh, are you the one who taught Griffey, Williams and Ott???
> >
> > Point is- you didn't unearth anything new which has been said to you on here before. Pull hitting and pull hitters have their "limited" (I.E.Vernon Wells)place in the game but it is no where near the unearthed shattering theory you profess it to be.
> >
> > Any chance you will ever address WHY Albert Pujols (power hitter)and now Vernon Wells have worked extra hard to NOT be pull hitters???
> >
> > Can you give us YOUR analytical reasoning why in TODAY's game these MLB players (one of whom is the BEST in the game) would shake their heads at your pull hitting theory ?
> >
> > If either one of them came on here and read your scientific magical numbers do you really think they would believe you unearthed a major break through for Major league (any) hitters??? I think not- because both equate their "success" today to avoiding PULL hitting.
> >
> > Yet, somehow in your self centered wisdom you think you are smarter than them. You may continue to promote you theory on here and apparently with Jack's blessing. You have your right to your opinion just as I do. I just don't want ANY smaller players believing and or god forbid trying to implement your PFO theory that could be detrimental to their ability to play this great game better.
> >
> > Now, any chance you can answer why Pujols and Wells (their highly paid professional hitting instructors) would strongly disagree with you on your PFO theory??? Pretend when you respond this time that you are responding to Albert Pujols and try selling him on your unearthed PFO theory.
> >
> > > Hi Sam R.
> > >
> > > Ken Griffey Jr., who did not use steroids, used PFO, as did Ted Williams, and Mel Ott.
> > >
> > > It has been proven from an anecdotal, logical, and geometric perspective.
> > >
> > >
> > > From an anecdotal perspective:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I unearthed an integral concept that will allow individuals will poor power to center and to right to increase the amount of home runs that they will produce.


Hey BHL- what gives??? Either PFO is YOUR thing YOU unearthed or its Nymans?
Seems anytime your theory gets squashed you don't hesitate to credit someone other than yourself for PFO.

Your newest statement: "My best guess is the difference between goal and aim. Perhaps a Griffey "cue" is hit it up up the middle to fulfill the "reality" of pulling everying pitch (credit to Nyman)."

OK so now you (or is it Nyman) are able to tell us what Griffey is/was thinking in order to put the spin on your PFO theory...what next...a man from Mars helped you put a spin on gravity???
>
> Best,
> BHL

And I love (below) this self fulfilling, self touting post you sent pretending someone other than you was interested in PFO...when in fact it was from you!


"Jack, can we get the dialog back on track? One person has dismissed BHL's calulations without commenting on any specific disagreement with his calculations. Another person has suggested that BHL has made a a good case. What I would like to see is YOUR evaluation of his calcs.I would love to see other people's evaluation as well, as long as the evaluation addresses specifics of his math & not just a general agreement or disagreement. This is a golden opportunity for us to discuss FACTS (pro or con) for once instead of the same old stuff about personalities, credentials, etc.BHL has made a presentation based on math & science, now Jack, can you lead the way in evaluating his analysis based on science and math? Thanks so much, let's have a great discussion!

I hope you understand my theory is supported by facts, not by hunches.

Best,
BHL

BHL- maybe Jack won't say it so I will. Your PFO theory IMO was just a way for use to use Jack's site to "unearth" your own 3 letter theory to sound as knowledgable about hitting and baseball as Jack who came up with BHT, THT and CHP too name a few.

Not only has your theory been shot down beyond your many statistical analogies by professionals playing the game today, but you have twisted so many responses and ignored legit questions (I.E. Pujols/Wells)that your credibility is what it should be here on JACK'S SITE...zilch!

I am also not convinced the handful of others on here who pretend to be interested in your PFO aren't in fact just you signing on as others. If they are not you then I would pose same Pujols/Wells questions to them and would expect some responses as to how these two current pro hitters have avoided PULL hitting and some feedback on how and why THESE TWO pro's should re-think their hitting strategies.

Refrain from anymore analysis paralysis and simply answer the question!!!

Jack -if you are in agreement with BHL then please, by all means provide same reasoning Pujols/Wells would work so hard to NOT be pull hitters???

Regards,

Sam R.