Posted by: Scott W (stwinton@netzero.net) on Sun May 28 09:12:11 2006

> Hi Anon,
>
> "If you did in fact hit like that, pitches on the inner half of the plate would now be like pitches on the inside black, and pitches on the inside black would now be unhittable."
>
> I beg to differ! Pitches can rarely pitch inside consistently anymore without being warned. This means that 100% of the plate no longer belongs to the pitcher--only 66 2/3% of it!
>
> This statement is also without merit: "Since apparantally you are a 'scholar' and not a ball player, let me explain some baseball lingo to you."
>
> Personally, I have seen my action on the field as a home run hitter in slo-pitch softball, and have acquired noble sucess by pulling every pitch.
>
> By the way, with less than two strikes, the strike zone shrinks to less than 66 2/3%. This means that, with less than two strikes, a batter can look to pull all pitches, and pass balls up that they do not like. If, with two strike, the batter chooses to make contact with ball instead of swinging for the fence, then that is understandable.
>
> This should prove that, contrary to your hypothesis, I do have a fundamental grasp of baseball.
>
> Best,
> BHL

BHL...

"This should prove that, contrary to your hypothesis, I do have a fundamental grasp of baseball."

I'd go so far as to say by what i've read here that you absolutely DO NOT have a fundamental grasp of the game...i'd challenge you to get one credible source to back your theory...and citing your slow pitch softball power numbers does nothing to prove your point, actually it weaken it for those that actually know the silly-ness of slow pitch softball when compared with good hitting at the professional level.


peace.