Re: Re: Re: Re: ‘bat speed’ vs ‘bat quickness’
>>> Hi Jack,
I agree with you that a swing plane problem might be a bigger issue then batspeed and quickness.
But, from what I've taken away with some of the discussion is trying to hard or reaching the highest batspeed as possible, can lead to a longer swing. Take longer to swing rather then staying quick.
For example, the first time I ever recorded batspeed I also video taped the session. The swings were just awful, long, over swinging, you name it. There must be a goal of remaining quick with affective mechanics.
There many ways to look at it , short, explosive, accelerating quickly, etc, etc,. As I continued to work on batspeed readings, and video taping I was able to significantly increase my batspeed without over swinging or just trying to swing hard. My technique improved and so did the batspeed.
All I know is you want to remain quick as well as increase your batspeed. The tell tale sign you comparing your swing next to a pro and see how much earlier you start your swing, or if you can match their quickness (which they are very quick).
www.baseballandfastpitch.com <<<
Hi Shawn
You state, “For example, the first time I ever recorded batspeed I also video taped the session. The swings were just awful, long, over swinging, you name it. There must be a goal of remaining quick with affective mechanics.” – When we say a swing is ‘long’, are we saying the distance the bat-head traveled from initiation to contact was ‘longer’? Or, are we saying the bat-head may have traveled the same distance, but due to inefficient swing mechanics, the swing took a ‘longer’ time to accomplish.
I think it would be helpful for our discussions if we had a clear definition of just what we mean by a “long swing.” – Longer bat-head travel – longer hand travel – longer time – longer what?
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Jack Mankin
Followups:
Post a followup:
|