Posted by: Dumont (doomzday2@hotmail.com) on Fri Sep 23 23:09:08 2005

With many years of playing experience I beleive that swinging as hard as you possibly can is not the right way to play. I've hit some good shots doing this but my tape measure shots have been hit usually with two strikes. Which tells me that I was just trying to make solid contact. And I was concentrating on the ball. Aiming for center field. Swinging hard with good mechanics is nice. But hitting the ball on the barrell of the bat squarely is a thing of beauty. And I think you acheive this more often with a perceived slower swing. When you swing too hard people tend to stiffen up which actually robs them of power. I've said this before.. The 100 meter sprinter runs totally relaxed because that is when he creates his best speed and power. A swing is no different. So visualize yourself swinging over second base with good contact. I do this in one of my slo-pitch leagues and I hit at least one out a game. Sometimes 2.. 3. And I know it works because no one hits the ball as hard as I do. Or as consistently. I hope this helps you..
> > >>> while batting should i be swinging as hard as a I can or should I be having a more speed controlled swing. While reading all the info on this site and others, people talk about how you should achieve maximum batspeed when hitting a pitch but then people say you don't have to try and kill the ball to hit it out. But if you are swinging with your maximum batspeed isn't this trying to kill the ball?? Any thoughts would help. Thanks.<<<
> >
> > Hi Ranger
> >
> > Jack Nickolas has long maintained that the swing should be preformed with maximum effort. This would also hold true for many of the best baseball hitters. However, it should be pointed out that as these top performers increase their effort, the efficiency of their swing mechanics places the increasing load on the larger muscles of their legs and torso instead of increasing the stress on the smaller muscles of their arms and wrist.
> >
> > Below is an article I wrote on this subject.
> >
> > Jack Mankin
> > ##
> >
> > Truism or Fallacy
> > Rethinking Old Baseball Hitting Theories
> >
> > "Swing For the Fence - Ruin Your Mechanics"
> >
> > Subject: Pushing the limits of flawed mechanics.
> >
> > I think all coaches would agree that "setting goals" is an important tool in the development of good athletes. The goals should challenge the athlete to be the best he can be. The setting of a goal that does not place the athlete far ahead of his past achievements is an insult to his courage. My dad used to say, "Son, it is far better to shoot for the moon and reach only the peak of a mountain; than to aim for the foothills an attain it."
> >
> > When setting goals for hitting the baseball, a strange inconsistency arises. By far, the number one prize of batting is that gratifying sensation a player experiences in hitting a long home run. The soothing vibes of power the bat resonates through the hitter's body is something a player will never forget. However, many batting coaches have discovered that the mechanics they are teaching will breakdown if the hitter attempts to swing with home run power. The player must be made to understand that home runs should not be sought after. They are something that just happens when the hitter least expects it.
> >
> > The coach must convince the players that to be successful they must "hit the ball on the ground back up the middle." His most worrisome time is right after a player hits a home run. How can he make sure that he and other players do not strive for another one? He has spent weeks convincing the players to forget about the fence and just "hit it up the middle." If the hitter should endeavor for something more than mediocrity it could ruin his mechanics forever.
> >
> > I can think of no other sport where striving to attain it's most prized goal is declared mechanically taboo. The paradox is so sad but true. With the mechanics coaches have been given to teach, the more power the hitter attempts to achieve the weaker the results. But the real sad part is, we have found it easier to lower the goals than to perfect the mechanics. When the seven-foot high-jump couldn't be attained with the mechanics being used, they didn't advise the athletes to settle for a lower mark or they might ruin their form. Records from the four minute mile to a twenty foot pole-vault would never have been achieved by teaching that adversity should lead to the lowering of expectations.
> >
> > I feel there is a touch of arrogance in claiming that since a coach can't teach an average player to hit with power, those that have power must have been born with "pop" in their bat. Is it possible the top hitters may not be using the mechanics they teach? It may be time to acknowledge that teaching linear mechanics will not allow a hitter to attain the bat speed required to consistently hit the ball hard.
> >
> > By initiating the bat properly with torque and rotational energy, the average tension free swing of the hitter carries plenty of bat speed to clear the fence in most any direction. His main concern is timing and getting the plane of his swing in line with the ball. If he is a little high on the ball, it will be a sizzling grounder. Hit it square and you have a frozen-rope to the gaps -- a little low and bye, bye.
> >
> > Jack Mankin
>
> Ranger,
>
> We are only as strong as our weakest link. Think of any compound effort (such as a swing) as a series of muscle groups firing in sequence. These muscles have the cumulative effect of increasing applied force on the next muscles in sequence. The net result is as much controlled force is applied to the bat as possible.
>
> However, as swing effort increases, smaller (i.e. weaker) muscle groups in this sequence begin to fail, and must be compensated for by larger muscle groups. As a result, less bat control is achievable.
>
> Thus, to execute the optimal swing mechanic, one should only apply as much force as can be controlled - to the extent the correct swing mechanic is exhibited with maximum batspeed.
>
> Regards,
> Mike.