 | |
![[ About ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-1.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Batspeed Research ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-2.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Swing Mechanics ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-3.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Truisms and Fallacies ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-4.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Discussion Board ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-5.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Video ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-6.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Other Resources ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-7.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Contact Us ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-8.gif){kind=small} |  |
 | |
|
Re: The Proof is in the Geometry Posted by: Jack Mankin (MrBatspeed@aol.com) on Fri Sep 23 11:21:02 2005 >>> My model has been depicted geometrically. <<<
Hi BHL I was just wondering, would you say that anyone who advocates hitting the ball to the opposite field could claim they have developed a new “model” as you have with PFO? Jack Mankin Followups:
Post a followup:
|
