[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Under the ball


Posted by: THG () on Mon Aug 18 15:02:32 2008


> It will continue to amaze me how infrequently Ted and, the Science of hitting, get referenced.
> The man laid it all out in black and white, not only in his book but, in a film clip that coincides with the book.
> But ,people will continue to search for the unattainable hitting grail and, harp on buzz words that, to say are inapplicable in the batters box, is an understatement.
> The last man to hit 400, with over 500 home runs,shows the world his coveted hitting principles and, people look else where for the answers...
> I guess he didn't use fancy enough buzz words.



AMEN AMEN AMEN. I second your thoughts, but people just cannot believe that hitting could be that simple.


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
Three strikes is an _____________?
   Homerun
   Out
   Stolen base
   Touchdown

   
[   SiteMap   ]