Posted by: Hitter (hitguru205@aol.com) on Sat Jul 9 10:24:42 2005

> Hitter,
>
> Sorry for being so blunt, but:
>
> 1. you did not answer my question.
>
> 2. you are not correct with what contextual interference seems like.
>
> 3. you are not correct with what schema theory means. if you were, you would know exactly how it applies to this discussion.
>
> 4. you are welcome (for the thanks you gave me trying to help you understand) but, either I am not doing a very good job or you are not trying hard enough.

Honesty may not be the best to hear, but it gets the point across best, so I'm perfectly fine with it.

I'm hesitant to say, "OK, I get it now," but the articles gave me a better idea. You're basically telling me to try and practice using different methods rather than repeating one single method many times? That is what I got from reading the articles.

Sorry for not answering your other question. No, I don't think it's the only way. I learned this when I practiced throwing mechanics. I tried different things until one worked really well, and then I practiced that one way until I became comfortable with it. I think this is what you're advocating with hitting.

Before we go any further, is that correct?