[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Critique this swing.


Posted by: Frank The Commish (fjccommish@gmail.com) on Fri Jul 8 23:54:23 2005


The thing that strikes me is the negative movement. Muscles are not bow strings, that have to be pulled back to apply force the opposite direction.



> Would you classify this swing as rotational or linear. Also, is this an effective swing.
> 1.) We use a 40/60 stance, feet spread just past shoulders.
> 2.) Knees with slight bend
> 3.) Bat off back shoulder at 45 degree angle, back elbow down.
> 4.) Door knocking nuckles lined up.
> 5.) Head level, both eyes on pitcher.
> 6.) On stride/load hitter takes a 2-3 inch stride WITH weight transfer, the 10% that was on back leg transfers to front so in essence you have a balanced 50/50 spread. Hands move back and up forming a small c which is your negative movement.(stride/load done at same time)
> 7.) Unlocking from shoulder/elbow/wrist as bat is swung. Bat is leveled and acceleration is achieved through the driving on the elbow and turning the wrists palm up/ palm down/
> 8.) Head is down at impact point, hitting off the front foot's instep. Back elbow has bend in it to allow for the ball to be driven.
> 9.) Hands stay inside the ball/short to the ball/ long through extension after contact.
> 10.) Can you tell me if you feel this is an effective approach or what you would change?


Thank you.


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts

   
[   SiteMap   ]