 | |
![[ About ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-1.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Batspeed Research ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-2.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Swing Mechanics ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-3.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Truisms and Fallacies ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-4.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Discussion Board ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-5.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Video ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-6.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Other Resources ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-7.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Contact Us ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-8.gif){kind=small} |  |
 | |
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cage vs. Game Posted by: ray porco (rporco@verizon.net) on Wed Jun 22 16:38:43 2005 Jim,
You illustrate my point nicely, by using Jack Mankin and Mike Candrea as examples. You say, "There indeed is one correct way to swing. " I assume you to believe Jack Mankin's hitting model to be correct, as well as Mike Candrea's model. Their hitting models are diametrically opposed. What one believes to be correct is NOT shared by the other. How then, can BOTH be correct? Followups:
Post a followup:
|
