Re: Re: Re: Attn: Jack! Pt . 1 of 3!
> > Reading your post made me thank God for Jack Mankin. Your improvement to Jacks terminology is a kludge of meaningless terms that don't make any sense.
>
> Dinger!
>
> You can disagree with some of Jack's assertions, but at least he is concise. BHL - you are verbose. Combined Hand Reactive Exertion? Wasn't this Enigma cipher cracked 60 yrs ago?
>
Hi Mike,
I suggested in an earlier post that Jack divide his information into a section of hitting tips, which references a more complicated appendix clarifying some scientific misnomers. That would strengthen Jack's material.
I liked your response, and found it fairly humorous.
Sincerely,
BHL
> Mike
Followups:
Post a followup:
|