[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: THT & Step vs No step


Posted by: Mike Myers (mike.myers@bell.ca) on Mon Jan 10 09:26:11 2005


>>> Another advantage is, during the pitch, a hitter can footplant 2 inches laterally for better inside/outside coverage as required. <<<
>
> Hi Mike.
>
> I would like to have hitters who faced a 90+ mph fastball comment on your statement. As for myself and the batters I have worked with, toe plant takes place before pitch location is determined for pitches in the 80’s.
>
> >>> Back weightshift during the inward turn is offset with slight forward stride. <<<
>
> Maybe some negative stride hitters may replant their foot forward again. But, it does not appear Bagwell takes a “slight forward stride” after planting his toe back toward the catcher
>
> Jack Mankin
>

Jack, I would be interested in Bagwell's 1994 stance (.368, 39HR, 400AB, 750SLG). His other years, while good, pale in comparison.

Mike.


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts

   
[   SiteMap   ]