Posted by: ssarge (ssarginson@earthlink.net) on Wed Dec 15 14:52:19 2004

Ray,

Actually, I think you do have quite a bit to contribute. I have definitely learned some things from you, and you have stimulated my thinking in many areas.

However, any exchange of ideas with you seems to become almost instantly adversarial, and I find that uncomfortable. Not the way I want to maintain relationships - even "online" relationships.

Could be my issue, I guess - I'm not assessing blame. Just saying that it dillutes the experience for me to the point that I am uncomfortable.

Regards,

Scott



Ssarge,
>
> Thanks for the primer, but as you said:
> “Probably this is familiar information to most in this forum - I think it is well known.”
> and
> g1smd already told us that in the link I provided.
>
>
>
> your quote:
> “And I'm not sure of the context / point anyway.”
>
>
>
>
> The point is Paul Nyman says one thing, but truly means another.
>
> As in:
> “This web site is not about building "numbers", as in number of of posters or visitors.”
>
> Vs.
>
> http://www.searchengineforums.com/apps/searchengine.forums/forum::google/thread::1042412390/action::thread/
>
>
> why, you think?
> you stuck your nose in.
> care to answer for Paul?
> he won't answer me. he won't debate me. why? oh, here it comes - the "agenda" answer. BULLCRAP!
>
> he wants nothing to do with those who disagree or who have potential to prove him wrong.
> bye, bye CoachC.
> bye, bye Tom.Guerry
> absolutely no more GOLF posts.
> You’re a fool, you’re an idiot, you’re a crackpot.
>
> He even reads your email.
>
>
> He and others say I bring nothing to the discussions.
> Do you really think that Ssarge? Can you honestly answer that question?
> Do you think that I don’t support myself with proofs?
> At one point I had a desire to share a teaching method, - no takers.
> Why? Too abstract, most replied. Bullcrap, again. TOO MUCH WORK IS MORE LIKE IT. Too hard on the old brain. Let’s just put up another video of some kid, and pick his swing apart. More fun, that way. Less work, too.
>
> HIS DOUBLE PENDULUM MODEL IS FLAWED.
> IT IS A MACHINE.
> IT MAY VERY WELL BE HOW WE SHOULD SWING, BUT IT IS NOT HOW WE……
>
> HIT.
> Dammit.
>
> and in the end, that's all he is - a SWING instructor.
> his website should be SWINGING-MECHANICS.COM.
>