Posted by: ssarge (ssarginson@earthlink.net) on Wed Dec 15 14:52:19 2004

Ray,

Actually, I think you do have quite a bit to contribute. I have definitely learned some things from you, and you have stimulated my thinking in many areas.

However, any exchange of ideas with you seems to become almost instantly adversarial, and I find that uncomfortable. Not the way I want to maintain relationships - even "online" relationships.

Could be my issue, I guess - I'm not assessing blame. Just saying that it dillutes the experience for me to the point that I am uncomfortable.

Regards,

Scott



Ssarge,
>
> Thanks for the primer, but as you said:
> �Probably this is familiar information to most in this forum - I think it is well known.�
> and
> g1smd already told us that in the link I provided.
>
>
>
> your quote:
> �And I'm not sure of the context / point anyway.�
>
>
>
>
> The point is Paul Nyman says one thing, but truly means another.
>
> As in:
> �This web site is not about building "numbers", as in number of of posters or visitors.�
>
> Vs.
>
> http://www.searchengineforums.com/apps/searchengine.forums/forum::google/thread::1042412390/action::thread/
>
>
> why, you think?
> you stuck your nose in.
> care to answer for Paul?
> he won't answer me. he won't debate me. why? oh, here it comes - the "agenda" answer. BULLCRAP!
>
> he wants nothing to do with those who disagree or who have potential to prove him wrong.
> bye, bye CoachC.
> bye, bye Tom.Guerry
> absolutely no more GOLF posts.
> You�re a fool, you�re an idiot, you�re a crackpot.
>
> He even reads your email.
>
>
> He and others say I bring nothing to the discussions.
> Do you really think that Ssarge? Can you honestly answer that question?
> Do you think that I don�t support myself with proofs?
> At one point I had a desire to share a teaching method, - no takers.
> Why? Too abstract, most replied. Bullcrap, again. TOO MUCH WORK IS MORE LIKE IT. Too hard on the old brain. Let�s just put up another video of some kid, and pick his swing apart. More fun, that way. Less work, too.
>
> HIS DOUBLE PENDULUM MODEL IS FLAWED.
> IT IS A MACHINE.
> IT MAY VERY WELL BE HOW WE SHOULD SWING, BUT IT IS NOT HOW WE��
>
> HIT.
> Dammit.
>
> and in the end, that's all he is - a SWING instructor.
> his website should be SWINGING-MECHANICS.COM.
>