Posted by: Doug () on Thu Nov 18 14:47:15 2004

>>> Tom, Exactly.....the clips of Rose, Murcer, B.Williams and F.Robinson show the hands/wrists have not rolled over at impact, but the bathead is in front of the hands at impact also. The clip of Rose shows the hands slightly ahead of the bathead, and he is hitting a ball a little to right of center. When the barrel is slanted/pointed to the pull field, the hands are behind the barrel. When the barrel is slanted/pointed to center field, the hands are even with the barrel. When the barrel is slanted/pointed to the off field, the hands are ahead of the barrel. In all of my posts, I don't talk about the wrist/hands rolling over, and as far as players not having strong hands and wrists.......well, they faze out in high school. <<<
>
> Hi Doug
>
> This disagreement reminds me of two guys having lunch on a train. One is looking out the window at the scenery flying by and says, “man, we must be going 90 mph.” The other is looking at the steak he is cutting and replies, “looks to me as if we are not moving at all.”
>
> Doug, movement is a matter of reference. I doubt that the dimmest among us does not understand that, in reference to the flight of an incoming pitch, the bat-head must lead the hands to pull a ball. That is obvious. However, mb’s original post on this thread discussed deceleration of the bat in regards to the hands position. I am merely pointing out that deceleration has not necessarily occurred on pulled balls because ‘in reference to’ the direction of the radial force being applied (CHP), the bat has not necessarily swung past tangent.
>
> Jack Mankin
> Jack, The two guys having lunch on the train story was amusing. I thought that some of the answers were like the guy who asked what time it was and the other fellow tried to build him a watch.