Posted by: () on Sun Oct 24 20:10:45 2004

>>> Hi Andy,
> I did get a chance to look at these clips . I did notice in the clip with Sammy using a solo hitter to practice his swing he wasn't really focusing on swinging up to much .I understand what causes the ball to get lift and that isn't what my disagreement is here.The clips that I see here are all shots of hitters trying to get lift .I understand the swing plane angles and the physics behind what creates this effect.I didn't agree that all hitters have the strength and ability at certain levels to try only to approach the swing in an upward angle.I know that The Ultimate batting tee with the ball on the tee now with the angle adjustment allows a hitter to have a 8-12 degee upslope approach to the ball .I'm also aware of the importance of bat speed being a important factor in producing homeruns.I would say that the swing frames that I have looked at all hitters are very strong and have the tools to focus the swing in a slight to extreme upward angle.I will be creating some video to show that this can be achieved by using the ultimate batting tee.I know the homerun has become the focus,I would love to see some frames of swings that achieved line drives and hard ground balls.I think there are a number of hitters that focus on leveling out.I hope I answered your question I would like to talk to you .(513)616-3611 ERIK LASEKE <<<
>
> Hi Erik
>
> The theme one takes from your post is that the only reason for an up-slope at contact is to attain lift to hit home runs. However, a ball hit dead canter with a bat angling up at 8 to 12 degrees produces a line drive – not the lift to hit the ball for distance. You do not seem to address, or acknowledge, the fact that an upward bat path stays in the path of a ball angling downward for a longer period of time. This allows for a more consistent hard contact.
>
> If the path of an incoming ball was level with the ground, having the bat “level out” through the contact zone would make sense. But this is not case with pitches belt down – why would you want the bat’s path to cut through the balls path instead of lining up with it?
>
> Jack Mankin
>
BTW Erik, I didn't believe this theory the first time I heard it (response: Come on, it takes longer, you'll hit fly balls, etc) and even two years ago I was teaching and practicing "stay above the ball", "barrel above the hands", "direct path to the ball", etc. But after videotaping every swing I could I realized 95% of mlb'ers can't be wrong. And websites such as this have allowed me to realize that the slighly longer path can actually create batspeed and more than make up for the added length. And I believe the mlb playes swing this way, not simply because their strength allows them to, but because it's the only way to consistently hit top level pitching the way they do.