[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Existence of Torque cont.


Posted by: Jack Mankin (mrbatspeed@aol.com) on Tue May 18 10:41:03 2004


>>> The movement of the bathead at this point is reactionary. <<<

Hi Teacherman

Please explain how your “reactionary” force induces angular displacement differently than torque, the recognized physics law governing angular displacement. IF “reactionary” is a law of physics, list any text where I can study its definition and principles.

You stated, “You continue to use Sheffield's prelaunch movement as proof of something you call an absolute when in fact, Sheffield and a handful of others are the only ones that do what he does. How can that be an absolute.”

Teacherman, the laws of physics must remain constant under all circumstances, not just the obvious as when obtaining readings from a torque wrench. The laws must also cover the more rare circumstances such as the torque applied in Sheffield’s pre-launch movements.

Jack Mankin


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
Three strikes is an _____________?
   Homerun
   Out
   Stolen base
   Touchdown

   
[   SiteMap   ]