[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To: Jack


Posted by: Milt () on Fri May 14 19:17:06 2004


>>> Pure undadulterated hogwash.
>
> Bat quickness does not equal bat speed. It has nothing to do with linear. It has everything to do with proper rotation. It has nothing to do with THT. How could it? It doesn't exist.
>
> Quickness is how fast you can get the barrel to contact. Speed has to do with how fast the barrel is moving at the time. Two very different concepts. One doesn't automatically lead to the other. <<<
>
> Hi Teacherman
>
> It is time for you to prove the accuracy of your statements.
>
> (1) Top-hand-torque does not exist.
>
> (2) Bat quickness does not equal bat speed.
>
> I will not except any further posts from you that do not pertain to offering proof THT does not exist, and that from initiation (rotation and hands accelerated) a bat can reach contact quicker without attaining greater bat speed. – Proof , Teacherman, not your opinions. There are also plenty of clips available for you to make your case.
>

I can't understand why anyone would deny the existence of THT or think there is a difference in bat speed and bat quickness. Could it be that these non-believers have not studied the material at this site? Could it be that these people have not bought Jack's tape and dvd? Could it be that these people think the erath is flat, or that the sun revolves around the earth? Wow!!!!!
> >
>


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts

   
[   SiteMap   ]