Posted by: Doug () on Wed May 5 09:48:01 2004

Dear Jack,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I have promulgated some controversial ideas in the past, and the one that I am about to suggest might cause the most dissention among posters.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I have thought out my recommendation rather carefully, and am ready to accept any feedback--positive or negative--from others. Specifically, I believe that right-handed hitters that throw righty may find it advantageous to perform Jack's drills while batting left-handed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The primary reason for my suggestion is that many right-handed batters who throw in the same batter tend to drive the bat linearly, since they are top hand dominant. As a result, their natural physical attributes work against creating a good circular handpath.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, if right-handed throwers were told to bat lefty, their power hand would be their bottom hand, forcing their lead arm to straighten, and their top hand to stay back, which is essential for a circular hand path, and bottom hand torque.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, many righties who bat the same way that they throw tend to be right-footed. On Batspeed.com, numerous individuals agree that straightening the rear knee is imperative in order to develop good lower body mechanics, but fail to understand that right-handed throwers the hit righty use their weaker leg--their left leg--to straighten to knee, making the rotation slightly slower.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > However, if they hit lefty, they use the quicker, stronger knee--the right knee, to straighten the front leg, making hip rotation a little bat faster.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Finally, in both "Final Arcs," Jack argues that it takes a while to overcome poor muscle memory. While I agree, I believe that it would take an inordinate amount of time of right-handed batters that hit righty to forget their old linear mechanics, and learn new rotational mechanics.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Seen in this light, it would make much more sense if a right-handed hitter hits the opposite way he throws, and learns good mechanics from the start, than teaching a right-handed hitter who throws righty to convert to rotational mechanics, which will take twice as long.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the end, these facts seem to support hitting the opposite way that one throws.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BHL
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I would guess 80% or better of the best players in the world throw and bat right handed. And, you see it as a problem??????????????
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Next.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Teacherman,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, I do not. I just believe that linear right-handed hitters that bat the swing way will have an easier time if they just learn new mucle memory from the left time, instead of learning how to forget old muscle memory, and learn new muscle memory from the right side, whichwill take twice as long.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > BHL
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > BHL as usual you come up with the most intriguing and great ideas.I wish we had more people like you at the site.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BHL, apparently Teacherman is unaware that Williams, Boggs and Brett batted left and threw right...... it's not so much that right/right is bad, it's that throw right/bat left is an extra ADVANTAGE..... ask RQL what he thinks since he threw right/batted left.....
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As ususual, another illogical stretch from grc. I also bat left and throw right. The advantage has to do with your ability to hit opposite of all the right handed pitchers you face. It has little to do with which hand is dominant and all the other BS that BHL suggests. As evidenced by the vast majority of players that play at the highest level possible that both throw and bat right handed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > teacherman,maybe you also throw right and hit left ....don't take this personally, but i don't think that puts you in the same company as brett, williams, boggs and rql!!!....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More evidence that grc is not interested in the subject but instead he'd like to encourage discontent.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No where did I say I'm in their category. And, no where in my previous post was there any mention that those who bat left and throw right can not be very successful. Yet, that is what grc reads. As in, you can only see what you can see, you can also only understand what you're capable of understanding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The point remains, if you care to discuss it, that there is no evidence that being right hand dominant means you should bat left handed so your lead arm is dominant; as evidenced by a very high percentage of the best players in the world being both right handed throwers and batters.
> > > > >
> > > > > teacherman i am interested in the subject, especially since i have first hand knowledge of the subject...obviously you don't but i'm sure that won't stop you ...keep talking...you might convince yourself that you have something to say....
> > > >
> > > > As an example of your lack of understanding, you still believe linear hitters have more time than rotational hitters. Or, said another way, you believe rotational hitters have to start their swings earlier than linear hitters. It's the exact opposite. Jack confirms it. Other guru's confirm it. Video confirms it. But grc doesn't.
> > >
> > > teacherman, everything i have ever posted has been based on EVIDENCE....the fact that you don't have the time or ability to READ does not change the fact that "linear" hitters have .0167 more time to react to a pitch than do "rotational" hitters....now,if it will make you feel good i'll be nice and let YOU have the final word on this matter, as i am not going to waste any more of my valuable time on you....
> >
> > grc, I would like to know who is a linear hitter? Which so called linear hitter has .0167 more time than who? I have never seen a so called linear hitter in the big leagues, have you? Who is it?
> >
> > Doug
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> I think you meant say .167 average. In actuality George "Boomer" Scott batted only four points higher that one year (i.e., .171 average, 350 at bats, 60 hits).
>
> If "Boomer" batted .0171--which is impossible, since batting averages are always rounded to the nearest thousandth, not ten-thousandth--he would hit only 6 times in 350 at bats.
>
> Yes, linear hitters do exist. However, their style causes them to contact the ball, with little or no power.
>
> Sincerely,
> BHL
> Knight1285@aol.com

BHL, Try reading the posts before you comment.Your post makes no sense whatsoever. Explain what a ML linear hitter does and who they are. Linear is tossed around, but I have yet to see any of you explain the linear swing, if there is such a thing.

Doug