 | |
![[ About ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-1.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Batspeed Research ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-2.gif){kind=small} |  |
![[ Swing Mechanics ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-3.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Truisms and Fallacies ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-4.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Discussion Board ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-5.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Video ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-6.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Other Resources ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-7.gif){kind=small} | |
![[ Contact Us ]](http://www.batspeed.com/images/home-left-8.gif){kind=small} |  |
 | |
|
Re: Linear and rotation The way I see it BHL is between rotation and linear,Teacherman is linear and Jack is full blown rotation all the way. From what I have seen at the college games most power hitters fit in with the Jack Mankin model. Nothing personal to BHL and Teacherman but I think anything less than 100 percent rotational is self defeating.
I agree Jack is rotational (actually he is the Father of Rotation) and Teacherman is linear (he thinks you can take hands straight to the ball). However, I don't see anything in BHL's posts that suggests he is one way or another. BHL, can you clear this up? Followups:
Post a followup:
|
