Posted by: BHL (Knight1285@aol.com) on Wed Apr 7 21:07:47 2004

>
> > > Pulling all pitches in no way, shape or form, cures poor transfer mechanics. The majority of hitters extend their arms to pull baseballs........this is a no-no!
> > >
> > > For the record a baseball field is set up with center field being the furthest, why do you suppose it's set up that way? Maybe it's because too many home runs would be hit if it were closer than left and right. So where is the power really to left or center. I would suggest that optimizing a straight ball to a square bat (perpendicular) increases the collision factor. As opposed to not squaring the bat to the incoming the pitch. The latter increases the likehood of putting undesireable side-spin on the ball and minimizing the sweet spot, ie....top-spin roller, etc. Bonds is strong enough to hit balls out by pulling, but his farthest balls will always be to dead center......better collision factor.
> > >
> > > Only my opinion, so for those that want to pull........do it.
> > >
> > > For many of us, hitting the ball up the middle (assuming good tranfer mechanics), minimizes any potential timing errors. Bonds pulls the ball, Pujols, Ramirez and A-Rod try to go middle. I think looking at their spray charts would bare this out.
> > >
> > > Coach C
> >
> > Hi Coach C,
> >
> > Frank Thomas proves that even with less hitting surface (i.e., broken bats), pulled balls result in home runs when hit to the shortest part of the field, due to the bat-speed created.
> >
> > This also means everyone can be a home run hitter. All one needs to do is practice pulling every ball until they can "yank" them all 360 feet consistently. Go the center, and these are outs.
> >
> > The majority of Ott's 511 home runs were pulled to the shortest field of the Polo Grounds--right. Had this left-handed hitter hit to center, he would be unable to homer consistently.
> >
> > Just look at Ott--he is a promise for hitters of small stature aspiring to hit 40+ home runs.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > BHL
> > Knight1285@aol.com
> >
> > As always, your input is insightful.
>
> Jack,
>
> What is then connection between you and BHL that you won't take his theory to task?
>
> You clearly say you don't advocate trying to pull outside pitches. Yet you let BHL make the ridiculous statement over and over again.
>
> You've stated, as I have, that the goal is to hit the ball hard. My opinion is...who cares where it goes.
>
> BHL doesn't understand what happens in the swing when you try to pull outside pitches. And how that affects your ability to hit the inside pitch, or the high pitch or the low pitch or the offspeed pitch. He doesn't understand that in baseball a hitter has .4 seconds to make the swing decision. He can do this in slowpitch softball because he has time. And, maybe some professional hitters pull a lot of outside pitches. BUT, what do they do when THEY are time challenged. In other words, do they pull the Billy Wagner 100mph outside pitch? Do they pull the old Randy Johnson 97mph heater and still honor the slider? NO, NO, NO, and NO. Yes, some have pulled outside pitches for Home Runs. But, NO it is not the proper at bat plan.
>
> You like to censor my personality. That's fine. Would you please step to the plate and rid this site of this garbage.

Hi Teacherman,

It's funny...when Mac hit his 538-foot shot off Johnson, he pulled his 97 mph pitch located near the outside corner into the left-centerfield upper deck in The Kingdome. Now, you are going to argue: but he still hit it towards center.

How is this? When Mac faced Wagner a year later, he hit his 98 mph heater off the outer half of the plate, and pulled it into the leftfield upper deck at Busch Stadium.

Both these achievements were done using pull-field orientation.

Case closed.

Sincerely,
BHL
Knight1285@aol.com

P.S. Jack censors verbal attacks towards others, not opposing ideas. Therefore, I will continue to argue the benefits of my proposition in an intelligent manners. I like what Arthur Mann, in "How to Play Winning Baseball" says: ammunition that is not packed tightly will simply "fizz," just like the weak theories on this site will dissipate into nothingness. Just to let you know, I plan on continuing my attack on conventional baseball thinking, so I would appreciate if your comments criticized weakness in my arguments, not flaws in my character which do not exist.