Posted by: () on Sun Aug 3 00:51:50 2003

>>> EXCUSE ME, WEBMASTER OR JACK, BUT WHAT'S WITH SOME OF THE SNIDE REMARKS AND PUT-DOWNS THAT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE POSTED??????????????............THIS SITE WENT THROUGH HELL FOR A LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIME BECAUSE OF THIS KIND OF CRAP, AND YOU SOLVED THE PROBLEM BY GOING TO THE DELAYED POSTING AND SCREENING.................YOU DELAYED BUT DID YOU SCREEN SOME OF THE RESPONSES TO DR CHAMBERS?..........................HOW OFTEN DO WE GET SOMEONE LIKE DR CHAMBERS???????....NOT OFTEN AND YET YOUU ARE GOING TO ALLOW IT TO GET MESSED UP BECAUSE A FEW JERKS DON'T WANT TO LISTEN TO WHAT HE HAS TO SAY??????????????????????????????????/
> >
> >
> > I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO POST THIS, ALL I AM DOING IS ASKING THAT YOU DO A BETTER JOB SCREENING OUT THE YO-YO'S.........YES, AM UPSET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <<<
> >
> > Hi Bart
> >
> > Think of the number of times you (and many others) have grilled me on my work and credentials. I did not consider them to be snide remarks from a few jerks.
> >
> > Jack Mankin
>
> true, but i never made personal insults...
> >

Since you posted after the "maybe you are..." comment, I suppose you were referring to it. That's not an insult. I acknowledged that maybe he is what he says he is. At the same time, I point out to the other readers that maybe he isn't. Obviously, we have no way of knowing and must therefore weigh his words strictly on their own merit without attaching any weight to the claimed credentials until they can be verified. This is no insult-merely a stating of the obvious. Perhaps the more interesting question is why this so deeply offends you?