[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Jack Mankin vs. Mike Epstein


Posted by: Bart () on Wed May 14 16:32:40 2003


What are the difference and similarities in their theories of hitting.. which is better.. which should i invest in... can someone please explain how these theories of hitting works.... Thank You...
> >
> > They both address the issue of full XT and this concept is PROFOUND.
> >
> > There are particular issues that people may disagree with. I find the notion that the bottom hand rotates around the top hand to be erroneous. I think Epstein makes too much of his "torque position", and I have previously shown that the "torque position" is something that will happen automatically with good mechanics & without having to be forced/drilled. But overall, while many instructors will agree that "rotation" is good, Epstein & Jack are the ones who articulate quite well the relationship between full XT, the "L" and rotation.
>
> Where would hitting be without Bart?

I think the question is: where would hitting be without Jack, Epstein, Lau Sr, Lau Jr, Ellis, baker, Schmidt, Kendall, et al....and maybe throw in Tom & RQL!!!


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This famous game is played during the middle of the MLB season?
   Super Bowl
   World Series
   All Star Game
   Championship

   
[   SiteMap   ]